Created 04/29 11:02 AM Modified 04/29 11:02 AM




Stone Age cats made great pets
New Scientist vol 182 issue 2443 - 17 April 2004, page 13
 
PEOPLE were keeping cats as pets almost 10,000 years ago, say researchers who have stumbled on the grave of a prehistoric tabby in Cyprus. The Stone Age moggie lay close to the grave of a human, possibly its master.

Until now, historians thought the ancient Egyptians were the first to domesticate cats around 4000 years ago. But some evidence suggests cats were culturally important outside Egypt long before that. Stone and clay figurines of cats up to 10,000 years old have turned up in Syria, Turkey and Israel. And archaeologists have found 9000 to 9500-year-old cat bones in Cyprus, which has no native feline species.

"The first discovery of cat bones on Cyprus showed that human beings brought cats from the mainland to the islands, but we couldn't decide if these cats were wild or tame," says Jean-Denis Vigne of the French research organisation CNRS and the National Museum of Natural History in Paris.

But now a team led by Vigne has found the remains of a Neolithic cat that seems to have been a pet in a grave at the ancient site of Shillourokambos in Cyprus. The site contains the ruins of a large village that was inhabited 9000 to 13,000 years ago.

The cat belonged to the tabby species Felis silvestris, the wildcat from which domestic cats are descended. Its remains lie just 40 centimetres from a 9500-year-old human grave containing offerings such as stone tools and seashells. The human and cat skeletons are in identical states of preservation. The skeletons were positioned symmetrically, with both heads pointing west. This may have been intentional. The cat died when it was about eight months old, and while the cause of death is a mystery, there are no signs that the animal was butchered for food (Science, vol 304, p 259).

Vigne thinks the proximity of the human skeleton suggests the person had a strong bond with the cat, which might have been killed to go to the grave with its master. It made sense for early agricultural societies to mingle with cats, he adds, because cats would have killed the mice that nibbled their grain supplies.



 

The fashioning of hounds

Dogs probably socialised with people even earlier than cats. Graves in Israel more than 12,000 years old contain the remains of people lying alongside their pooches. But a new study suggests that while our ancestors chose their dogs wisely, today we opt for a Rottweiler or a Chihuahua just to conform to the latest fashion.

Early societies selected animals that were genetically predisposed to be good natured around humans. But a study of American Kennel Club records suggests that at some point cultural fads in the developed world became the dominant force for evolution in domestic dogs.

Harold Herzog, a psychologist at Western Carolina University in Cullowhee, surveyed the records of more than 40 million pure-bred puppies registered in the US over the past 50 years, and found the popularity of breeds randomly drifts in a similar way to changing tastes in clothing styles, music or food. His colleagues Alex Bentley of University College London and Matt Hahn of the University of California, Davis, also confirmed that the statistical patterns match those for another culturally driven vogue: popular baby names (Biology Letters, DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0185).

 

Hazel Muir