| PEOPLE
were keeping cats as pets almost 10,000 years ago, say researchers who
have stumbled on the grave of a prehistoric tabby in Cyprus. The Stone
Age moggie lay close to the grave of a human, possibly its master.
Until now, historians thought the
ancient Egyptians were the first to domesticate cats around 4000 years
ago. But some evidence suggests cats were culturally important outside
Egypt long before that. Stone and clay figurines of cats up to 10,000
years old have turned up in Syria, Turkey and Israel. And
archaeologists have found 9000 to 9500-year-old cat bones in Cyprus,
which has no native feline species.
"The first discovery of cat bones on
Cyprus showed that human beings brought cats from the mainland to the
islands, but we couldn't decide if these cats were wild or tame," says
Jean-Denis Vigne of the French research organisation CNRS and the
National Museum of Natural History in Paris.
But now a team led by Vigne has
found the remains of a Neolithic cat that seems to have been a pet in a
grave at the ancient site of Shillourokambos in Cyprus. The site
contains the ruins of a large village that was inhabited 9000 to 13,000
years ago.
The cat belonged to the tabby species Felis silvestris,
the wildcat from which domestic cats are descended. Its remains lie
just 40 centimetres from a 9500-year-old human grave containing
offerings such as stone tools and seashells. The human and cat
skeletons are in identical states of preservation. The skeletons were
positioned symmetrically, with both heads pointing west. This may have
been intentional. The cat died when it was about eight months old, and
while the cause of death is a mystery, there are no signs that the
animal was butchered for food (Science, vol 304, p 259).
Vigne thinks the proximity of the
human skeleton suggests the person had a strong bond with the cat,
which might have been killed to go to the grave with its master. It
made sense for early agricultural societies to mingle with cats, he
adds, because cats would have killed the mice that nibbled their grain
supplies.
| |
| The fashioning of hounds
Dogs probably socialised with people
even earlier than cats. Graves in Israel more than 12,000 years old
contain the remains of people lying alongside their pooches. But a new
study suggests that while our ancestors chose their dogs wisely, today
we opt for a Rottweiler or a Chihuahua just to conform to the latest
fashion.
Early societies selected animals
that were genetically predisposed to be good natured around humans. But
a study of American Kennel Club records suggests that at some point
cultural fads in the developed world became the dominant force for
evolution in domestic dogs.
Harold Herzog, a psychologist at
Western Carolina University in Cullowhee, surveyed the records of more
than 40 million pure-bred puppies registered in the US over the past 50
years, and found the popularity of breeds randomly drifts in a similar
way to changing tastes in clothing styles, music or food. His
colleagues Alex Bentley of University College London and Matt Hahn of
the University of California, Davis, also confirmed that the
statistical patterns match those for another culturally driven vogue:
popular baby names (Biology Letters, DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0185). |
|
| |
|