|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Nov. 15, 2005
BLOOMINGTON,
Ind. -- A gene thought to influence perception and susceptibility to
drug dependence is expressed more readily in human beings than in other
primates, and this difference coincides with the evolution of our
species, say scientists at Indiana University Bloomington and three
other academic institutions. Their report appears in the December issue
of Public Library of Science Biology.
The gene encodes prodynorphin, an opium-like
protein implicated in the anticipation and experience of pain, social
attachment and bonding, as well as learning and memory.
"Humans have the ability to turn on this gene
more easily and more intensely than other primates," said IU
Bloomington computational biologist Matthew Hahn, who did the brunt of
the population genetics work for the paper. "Given its function, we
believe regulation of this gene was likely important in the evolution
of modern humans' mental capacity."
Prodynorphin is a precursor molecule of the
neurotransmitters alpha-endorphin, dynorphin A, and dynorphin B,
collectively called opioids because their action is similar to
stimulatory effects caused by the drug opium.
The notion that humans are more perceptive
than other primates would hardly be news. But the list of genes known
to have tracked or guided humanity's separation from the other apes is
a short one. Genes controlling the development of the brain almost
always turn out to be identical or nearly so in chimpanzees and human
beings. And as it turns out, the protein prodynorphin is identical in
humans and chimps.
It's the prodynorphin gene's promoter sequence
-- upstream DNA that controls how much of the protein is expressed --
where the big differences are. "Only about 1 to 1.5 percent of our DNA
differs from chimpanzees," Hahn said. "We found that in a stretch of
DNA about 68 base pairs in length upstream of prodynorphin, 10 percent
of the sequence was different between us and chimps."
Hahn said this "evolutionary burst" is
responsible for differences in gene expression rates. When induced, the
human prodynorphin gene was 20 percent more active than the chimpanzee
prodynorphin gene. Past research has also observed variation in
expression levels within humans.
This report supports a growing consensus among
evolutionary anthropologists that hominid divergence from the other
great apes was fueled not by the origin of new genes, but by the
quickening (or slowing) of the expression of existing genes.
Hahn and his colleagues at Duke University,
University College London and Medical University of Vienna first became
interested in primate prodynorphin after noticing an unusual amount of
variation in the human version's promoter. The scientists decided to
examine the prodynorphin gene in human beings around the world and in
non-human primates to see whether such variation was commonplace and
whether that variation affected gene expression.
The group found a surprisingly large amount of
genetic variation among humans within the prodynorphin gene's promoter.
They examined prodynorphin genes from Chinese, Papua New Guineans,
(Asian) Indians, Ethiopians, Cameroonians, Austrians and Italians.
The group also sequenced and cloned
prodynorphin genes from chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, rhesus
macaques, pigtail macaques and guinea baboons. The researchers found
that high genetic variation in the prodynorphin promoter was unique to
humans. Other primates' promoters were far more homogeneous.
Exactly how prodynorphin influences human
perception is unknown. Evidence for its various effects comes entirely
from clinical studies of people who have mutations in the gene. Past
clinical studies have also indicated a positive correlation between
lower prodynorphin levels in the brain and susceptibility to cocaine
dependence.
Matthew Rockman, David Goldstein and Gregory
Wray (Duke University); Nicole Soranzo (University College London); and
Fritz Zimprich (Medical University of Vienna) also contributed to the
research. It was funded by grants from the National Science Foundation,
NASA, the Royal Society, and the Leverhulme Trust (U.K.).
To speak with Hahn, please contact David Bricker at 812-856-9035 or brickerd@indiana.edu.
|